Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpnaOLiU/PEANO_nosorts

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

and(tt, X) → activate(X)
plus(N, 0) → N
plus(N, s(M)) → s(plus(N, M))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

and(tt, X) → activate(X)
plus(N, 0) → N
plus(N, s(M)) → s(plus(N, M))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

and(tt, X) → activate(X)
plus(N, 0) → N
plus(N, s(M)) → s(plus(N, M))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
The following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [15] because they are oriented strictly by a polynomial ordering:

and(tt, X) → activate(X)
plus(N, 0) → N
plus(N, s(M)) → s(plus(N, M))
activate(X) → X

Used ordering:
Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(activate(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + 2·x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + x₁ + 2·x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(tt) = 2

↳ QTRS

  ↳ RRRPoloQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ RisEmptyProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
R is empty.
Q is empty.

The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.